[자료, 발췌] The Case Against Patents (2013)

출처: Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine, "The Case Against Patents," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 27, Number 1—Winter 2013



※ 발췌 (excerpt):

The case agasint patents can be summarized briefly: there is no empirical evidence that they serve to increase innovation and productivity, unless productivity is identified with the number of patents awarded─which, as evidence shows, has no correlation with measured productivity.

This disconnect is at the root of what is called the "patent puzzle": in spite of the enormous increase in the number of patents and in the strength of their legal protection, the US economy has been neither a dramatic acceleration in the rate of technological progress nor a major increase in the levels of research and development expenditure.

Both theory and evidence suggest that while patents can have a partial equilibrium effect of improving incentives to invent, the general equilibrium effect on innovation can be negative. The historical and international evidence suggests that while weak patent systems may mildly increase innovation with limited side effects, strong patent systems retard innovation with many negative side effects. More generally, the initial eruption of innovations leading to the creation of a new industry─from chemicals to cars, from radio and television to personal computers and investment banking─is seldom, if ever, born out of patent protection and is instead the fruit of a competitive environment. ( ... ... )