재검색:// conceptual arc에서 arc는 '틀(frame, framework)'처럼 꽉 짜인 것이 아니다

※ 발췌 (excerpts):


출처 1: Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory (1995)


2.2 A new approach

We propose a new approach to conceptual clustering, called COING, which consists in searching a concept hierarchy of a set of objects through a space of concept hierarchies ^explicitly^ built: the Generalization Space. This approach is based on a representation of complex objects using conceptual graphics [28]. We will first introduce some terminology and an example used along this article.


Knowledge representation. Our work being related to the MSG developed by Mineau [25], we have considered the same restrictions on the conceptual graphs: existential graphs where only binary relations are used. Such graphs may be decomposed without ambiguity as a set of triplets 〈concept 1, relation, concept 2〉. We call conceptual arc or arc such a triplet of a conceptual graph. Throughout this paper, we will use as an example a set of objects to be clustered (see figure 2). This set of objects, taken from [14], provides a good example of an application of our approach in spite of the fact that the objects do not require the full expression power of the conceptual graphs formalism. In this example, we represent each object using conceptual graphs; figure 3 presents the representation of an object.

The term ^concept^ will be used within two contexts:

 ─ an ^acquired concept^ in the conceptual clustering paradigm designs the entity "cluster ＋ cluster description",

 ─ a ^domain concept^ corresponds to a concept of the conceptual graphs formalism.

( ... ... )


출처 2: Abstraction, Reformulation, and Approximation (2003)

A conceptual arc is a triplet: [concept(s)] → (relation) → [concept(d)], where (relation) corresponds to a relation between [concept(s)] and [concept(d)]. A conceptual graph is a graph composed of a set of conceptual arcs. For more information about conceptual graphs, the reader should refer to [25] [5].

Figure 1 below presents an example of a house description using conceptual graphs. The triplet [Window] → (color) → [White] is a conceptual arc. This example is used throughout the article to illustrate the algorithms presented.



출처 3: Character Arc, Conceptual Arc and Thematic Arc: Which Should You Use? (Michael Lee | Script Mag, 2016년 5월 5일)

There are suddenly a lot of people coming out against character arcs. Some critics and writers take issue with the notion that every script requires a character arc. They site examples of very successful movies where the main character doesn't undergo a big, dramatic change like the modern classic ^Ghostbusters^ and the recent ^The Martian^. And these people have a point to an extent.

( ... ... )

Does the world see him differently at the end?  This is a gray area. Often characters are defined by what they think and feel and what they do. But you can consider their relationship with the rest of the world as part of their character. So what if that relationship is the thing that changes? It depends. What does the writer consider more important; the reason why society has changed its attitude towards the character? That would suggest a more thematic or conceptual arc for the story. But if what's important is how the change in attitude affects the character then we're back to the character arc.